第5期传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子书 - 英语阅读
歌曲信息
歌曲名：第5期传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子书
歌手：英语阅读
发行时间：未知
介绍：《第5期传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子书 - 英语阅读》英语阅读 & 英语阅读演唱的歌曲，由未知作词、未知作曲。
如果你觉得好听，欢迎分享给朋友一起看看歌词，一起支持歌手！
第5期传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子书 - 英语阅读 文本歌词
Real Books Quicker to Read than E-books
传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子
People can read traditional printed books a good bit faster
根据一项最新研究，看传统纸质书的速度比
than e-books on tablet computers, a new study has found.
在平板电脑上看电子书的速度要快
The study tested peoples’ pace of reading on two populare-reader
研究将人们在两种热门的电子阅读器——
tablets-Apple’s iPad and Amazon’s Kindle 2-as well as a
苹果的iPad 和亚马逊的Kindle2—上阅读的速度进行了对比，还和在
standard PC monitor and a regular book.
普通电脑屏幕上看书的速度以及看传统纸质书的速度进行了对比。
The 24 study participants read short stories by the author
24 名参与者应邀参加实验，实验内容是看海明威的短篇小说。
Ernest Hemingway, chosen “because his work is pleasant and
该研究是尼尔森·诺曼咨询集团发起的，
engaging to read, and yet not so complicated that it would be
研究的负责人雅各布·尼尔森说，
above the heads of users,” said Jakob Nielsen, who led the
选择海明威的小说是因为“他的作品引人入胜，
study for the Nielsen Norman Group.
而又不晦涩难懂”。
On average, it took people more than 17 minutes to read the
参与者平均用了超过17 分钟来看完
selected tales, which Nielsen wrote is “enough to get them
选出的故事，17 分钟的时间在尼尔森
immersed in the story” and is also “representative for many
看来足以让他们
ther formats of interest, such as whitepapers and reports.”
“沉浸到故事内容当中”。
To make sure people did not just skim the stories, the
为确保参与者不会跳读，
participants were given a reading comprehension tests afterward.
在测试结束后参与者还要完成一套阅读理解题。
Overall, the study revealed that people read text 6.2 percent
总的来看，在iPad 上看书比看纸质书速度要慢6.2%，
slower on an iPad than on the printed page. With the Kindle,
而用Kindle2 的
reading was 10.7 percent slower.
速度则要慢上10.7%。
Nielsen noted that this difference between the e-readers was
不过尼尔森说，在各种电子阅读器上阅览的速度
not statistically significant, however, so in the end the
差别并不大。最后
only fair statement is that “tablets still haven’t beaten
唯一合理的结论就是“电子书尚未完全打败
the printed book,” Nielsen wrote.
传统纸质书”。
Study participants also rated each reading implement from one
参与者还被要求给每种阅读工具打分——范围为1 分
to seven-with seven being the highest-and provided feedback
到7 分——并给出反馈意见。
as well.
iPad 上使用的iBook 程序得分最高，
The default iBook app on the iPad used for the test took top
不过也只得到了5.8 分。Kindle2
prize, but just barely, scoring a 5.8. Amazon’s Kindle, the
排在第二，得分为5.7 分，
close runner-up, ranked 5.7 and the regular book came in third
传统纸质书排在了第三，
by a hair at 5.6.
得分为5.6 分。
传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子
People can read traditional printed books a good bit faster
根据一项最新研究，看传统纸质书的速度比
than e-books on tablet computers, a new study has found.
在平板电脑上看电子书的速度要快
The study tested peoples’ pace of reading on two populare-reader
研究将人们在两种热门的电子阅读器——
tablets-Apple’s iPad and Amazon’s Kindle 2-as well as a
苹果的iPad 和亚马逊的Kindle2—上阅读的速度进行了对比，还和在
standard PC monitor and a regular book.
普通电脑屏幕上看书的速度以及看传统纸质书的速度进行了对比。
The 24 study participants read short stories by the author
24 名参与者应邀参加实验，实验内容是看海明威的短篇小说。
Ernest Hemingway, chosen “because his work is pleasant and
该研究是尼尔森·诺曼咨询集团发起的，
engaging to read, and yet not so complicated that it would be
研究的负责人雅各布·尼尔森说，
above the heads of users,” said Jakob Nielsen, who led the
选择海明威的小说是因为“他的作品引人入胜，
study for the Nielsen Norman Group.
而又不晦涩难懂”。
On average, it took people more than 17 minutes to read the
参与者平均用了超过17 分钟来看完
selected tales, which Nielsen wrote is “enough to get them
选出的故事，17 分钟的时间在尼尔森
immersed in the story” and is also “representative for many
看来足以让他们
ther formats of interest, such as whitepapers and reports.”
“沉浸到故事内容当中”。
To make sure people did not just skim the stories, the
为确保参与者不会跳读，
participants were given a reading comprehension tests afterward.
在测试结束后参与者还要完成一套阅读理解题。
Overall, the study revealed that people read text 6.2 percent
总的来看，在iPad 上看书比看纸质书速度要慢6.2%，
slower on an iPad than on the printed page. With the Kindle,
而用Kindle2 的
reading was 10.7 percent slower.
速度则要慢上10.7%。
Nielsen noted that this difference between the e-readers was
不过尼尔森说，在各种电子阅读器上阅览的速度
not statistically significant, however, so in the end the
差别并不大。最后
only fair statement is that “tablets still haven’t beaten
唯一合理的结论就是“电子书尚未完全打败
the printed book,” Nielsen wrote.
传统纸质书”。
Study participants also rated each reading implement from one
参与者还被要求给每种阅读工具打分——范围为1 分
to seven-with seven being the highest-and provided feedback
到7 分——并给出反馈意见。
as well.
iPad 上使用的iBook 程序得分最高，
The default iBook app on the iPad used for the test took top
不过也只得到了5.8 分。Kindle2
prize, but just barely, scoring a 5.8. Amazon’s Kindle, the
排在第二，得分为5.7 分，
close runner-up, ranked 5.7 and the regular book came in third
传统纸质书排在了第三，
by a hair at 5.6.
得分为5.6 分。
第5期传统书籍的阅读速度胜过电子书 - 英语阅读 LRC歌词
当前歌曲暂无LRC歌词
其他歌词
-
1
How Long Before You Hit the Breaking Point? 公司白领的极限点 Do you have a‘breaking point’for your life—a point where long 你生活中是否会出现“崩溃点”， work
-
2
Thirsty Clean Energy May Add to Water Stressed World 对清洁能源的需求可能会给水资源增加压力 As the world gets hotter and drier thanks to our predilection for 由
-
3
What Signals a Dog Is about to Attack? 狗攻击人的信号 Nearly 5 million dog bites occur in the U. S. each year， 根据美国人文协会统计， according to the American Hum
-
4
Traitorous Fish Throw Friends to The Wolves 叛逆的鱼儿宁愿牺牲朋友来保全自己 If you're being chased by a hungry bear, you're more likely to escape 如果你被一只
-
5
Innocent Fast Food Restaurant 快餐无辜 A study by academics from the University of California and 加利福尼亚大学和 Northwestern University claimed that "the cau
-
6
Exercise Really Does Make You Clever 锻炼让你更聪明 If you want to boost your child’s results at school, you could do a 如果想让你的孩子在学校的表现更加优异一
-
7
Oxford Dictionary, one part of our memory 牛津字典，我们记忆中的一部分 Sales of the third edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (OED) have 牛津大学出版社近日称
-
8
Passage 29. Alone Again, Naturally Alone, we squander life by rejecting its full potential and wasting its remaining promises. Alone, we accept that experiences
-
9
Passage 30. The Blue Days Everybody has blue days. These are miserable days when you feel lousy, grumpy, lonely, and utterly exhausted. Days when you feel small
-
10
Confucius in Foreigners'Eyes 外国人眼中的孔子 I first met Confucius in a friend's living room, nearly 10 years ago. OK, 大约 10 年前，我在一个朋友的起居室里第一次